This kind of Full bridge PFC is very simple and cheap to make and i cant understand why so many people buy off-the-shelf expensive PFCs. Not being able to draw much current when in the low part of the cycle seems fine to me.thats the beauty of it.the current draw is supposed to be more, the higher the input voltage.that way you get a fundamental current input wavefom thats more in-phase with the voltage input.the Power factor goes nearer to 1. I believe its due to the single switch having to take all the input voltage and having to take higher peak currents because boosts dont have bipolar flux drive like you get in a half bridgepush-pullfull bridge. Is the full bridge going to buck and boost Like Scotty said a standard boost pfc can handle KWs. How do you plan to draw current when the ac is on the lower part of the cycle ie. This will provide a smoother output voltage ripple for the output of the PFC. The SMPS downstream of the PFC will have its oscillator switching on at the instant that the PFC controllers oscillator would be switching off if it were on 50 duty. ON, then turn 4 ON fractionally later.then turn 1 off, then 2 ON fractionally later.then 4 OFF then 3 ON fractionally ) The ultimate output of this SMPS will be 24V. The Primary voltage will flip and the anti-parallel diodes across the MOSFETs will come into conduction conducting away the magnetising flux as current.ĭo you think I should put a small amount of capacitance across the downstream side of the mains rectifier so that this backflow of current can go into this capacitor (-Alternately, do you think that by slightly phasing the switching of the four MOSFETs that I could circumvent this problem of the magnetising current having nowhere to go at the switch-off instant.i.e. Since their will be an accumulation of magnetising field in the transformer core. I am worried about what will happen at the instant that a pair of MOSFETs turn off. Skema Smps Bridge Drivers Could Readily.
0 kommentar(er)
